<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org">
<title>Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery recent issues</title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org</link>
<description>Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery is a semimonthly peer-reviewed original science journal-rich in content, highly graphic in format, and international in perspective. Archives is a journal for all the specialties of medicine that perform cosmetic and reconstructive surgery of the face. It is the official publication for the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc. and the International Federation of Facial Plastic Surgery Societies.</description>
<prism:publicationName>Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1521-2491</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/364?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/365?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/366?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/369?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/378?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/395?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/399?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/404?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/405?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/409?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/412?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/414?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/416?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/420?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/421?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/423?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/426?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/426-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/428?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/436?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/282?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/284?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/285?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/290?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/296?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/303?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/306?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/311?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/320?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/327?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/332?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/338?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/343?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/347?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/349?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/354?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/360?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/218?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/220?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/221?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/230?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/234?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/235?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/239?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/240?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/245?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/246?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/251?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/252?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/257?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/262?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/263?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/266?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/267?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/271?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/273?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/274?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/275?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/280?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/154?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/156?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/157?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/165?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/170?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/171?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/178?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/183?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/184?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/193?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/194?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/198?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/202?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/203?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/205?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/209?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/212?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/213?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/216?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif">
<title>Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery</title>
<url>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif</url>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/364?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/364?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>364</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>364</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/365?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery [Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/365?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.88</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery [Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>365</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>365</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/366?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Evolution of the Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery [Editorial]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/366?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larrabee, W. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Informatics/ Internet in Medicine, Internet, Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.87</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Evolution of the Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery [Editorial]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>366</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>366</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/369?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Technical and Anatomical Aspects of the World's First Near-Total Human Face and Maxilla Transplant [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/369?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To discuss the technical and anatomical analysis and design of an osteocutaneous allograft transplant incorporating the donor maxilla and the execution of the operative protocol during the transplant.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> The Cleveland Clinic reported the world's first successful combined face and maxilla transplant in December 2008. Unlike the 3 prior face transplants, this surgical procedure was done as a salvage operation in a patient who had undergone 23 major reconstructive procedures. The additional complexity due to significant postoperative scarring and recipient vessel depletion presented a unique challenge in this case. The extensive 3-dimensional losses of facial structures in multiple tissue planes required a Le Fort III osteomyocutaneous allotransplant incorporating the donor maxilla.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> We report the first successful transfer of a complete bony framework and soft-tissue envelope. The allograft has shown excellent integration and no long-term rejection. The traditional conception based on anatomical studies suggested that this transfer would require independent dissection of the internal maxillary vascular system. This was not required in our patient whose allograft was based solely on the facial arterial system and its arcades.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Successful near-total face and maxilla allograft transplant can be accomplished based on the facial arterial system and its arcades. This presents a novel method for reconstructing massive facial injuries with significant involvement of the facial skeleton.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alam, D. S., Papay, F., Djohan, R., Bernard, S., Lohman, R., Gordon, C. R., Hendrickson, M., Siemionow, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Interventions, Other, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Physiology, Other, Transplantation, Transplantation, Other, Facial Plastic Surgery, Reconstructive Facial Surgery, Trauma/ Maxillofacial Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.80</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Technical and Anatomical Aspects of the World's First Near-Total Human Face and Maxilla Transplant [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>377</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>369</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/378?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-term Use and Follow-up of Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage Grafts in the Nose [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/378?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> In 1993, Kridel and Konior published a preliminary report (in the <I>Archives of Otolaryngology&ndash;Head and Neck Surgery</I>) on the use of irradiated homologous costal cartilage (IHCC) or homograft cartilage in the nose. This is a follow-up study to share our experience in answering fundamental questions: (1) What are the major long-term complications of IHCC, and are they any greater than with the use of the patient's own cartilage? (2) Is IHCC a reliable and safe implant? (3) Does IHCC resorb over time? (4) What measures are implemented in our practice to minimize the sequelae?</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> We performed a retrospective review of patient medical charts in a university-affiliated private practice setting. A total of 357 patients underwent primary or revision rhinoplasty using IHCC grafts with postoperative follow-up duration ranging from 4 days to 24 years (mean [SD], 13.45 [2.83] years). A total of 1025 IHCC grafts and 373 other grafts (including 218 autogenous cartilage [AC] grafts) were used. A total of 201 grafts were dorsal onlay grafts, and 74 of them have been further followed up since the previous report. The grafts were evaluated for warping, infection, infective resorption, noninfective resorption, mobility, and extrusion. Patient satisfaction evaluation was performed in 42 patients.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The total complication rate related to IHCC grafts was 3.25%, which included 10 warped grafts of 941 palpable or superficial IHCC grafts (1.06%), 9 infections of 1025 IHCC grafts (0.87%), 5 cases of infective resorption of 1025 IHCC grafts (0.48%), 5 noninfective resorptions of 943 palpable IHCC grafts (0.53%), and 3 cases of graft mobility of 941 palpable grafts (0.31%). Nine cases of local infection were treated and could have arisen from any of the 1025 IHCC grafts as well as from the 373 other grafts. Among the 9 cases of infection, in 2 patients IHCC grafts were used alone, and in 7 patients IHCC grafts were used in combination with other types of graft materials; therefore, the actual infection rate related to the pure use of IHCC was 2 of 1025 or 0.2%. Of the 218 AC grafts used at the same operative intervention along with IHCC grafts, 3 grafts (1.37%) underwent minimal resorption. The overall comparative resorption rates were 1.01% (IHCC) vs 1.37% (AC). The complication rate in conjunction with the use of 162 IHCC s in 53 cases of septal perforation repair was 2.46% (4 cases), including only 1 case of infection, 1 case of mobility of the graft, 1 case of warping, and 1 case of infective resorption (0.61% for all). Of the 25 AC grafts used in septal perforation cases, there were 2 cases of noninfective resorption (8%). The overall comparative complication rates in septal perforation cases were 2.46% for IHCC vs 8% for AC, which indicated a 3.25-times higher complication with the AC than with IHCC. No allergic reaction or systemic disease was reported by patients as a result of use of the IHCC. Irradiated homograft cartilage also proved to be a reliable graft in 2 patients with progressive autoimmune diseases over 2.08 years and 10 years of follow-up. The average rates of patient satisfaction increased during a mean follow-up of 7.87 years, from 91.31% to 94.18%, in 4 categories, including nasal appearance, nasal breathing, nasal symptoms, and quality of life.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Based on careful and extensive review of the data, we have concluded that IHCC is well tolerated as a grafting material in rhinoplasty and yields superb functional, structural, and cosmetic results in the most complex and challenging operative cases necessitated by previous unsuccessful nasal surgery, septal perforations, and even in autoimmune diseases that led to nasal deformity. Not only did very few complications occur following the use of 1025 IHCC grafts in 357 patients after 386 rhinoplasties over 24 years (rate, 3.25%), but the rate of complications was no greater than rhinoplasty complication rates when AC grafts are used. The results indicate safety and reliability and justify the convenient use of IHCC grafts for primary and revision rhinoplasty without creating donor site morbidity. Irradiated homograft cartilage grafts are quite stable in the nose and maintain structural contour and support in most cases. Irradiated homograft cartilage grafts should be considered as an alternative or even a primary grafting material when the patient does not have adequate quantities of septal or auricular cartilage remaining to provide the correction or when the shape or quality of such an AC does not adequately provide the structure required. Autogenous rib cartilage is also an alternative material but also increases operative and anesthesia time and adds potential morbidity. The use of IHCC is both cost- and time-effective.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kridel, R. W. H., Ashoori, F., Liu, E. S., Hart, C. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Transplantation, Transplantation, Other, Facial Plastic Surgery, Biomaterials and Implants, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Rhinoplasty]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.91</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-term Use and Follow-up of Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage Grafts in the Nose [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>394</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>378</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/395?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measurements of Orbital Volume Change Using Computed Tomography in Isolated Orbital Blowout Fractures [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/395?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To measure the orbital volume of unilateral pure blowout fractures with computed tomography before and after surgery and to compare 3-dimensional (3-D) imaging systems.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Twenty-four patients were evaluated with facial computed tomographic scans before and after surgery. Both the orbital volume and the displaced soft tissue volume were measured by 2 operators using 2 different 3-D software programs (Vitrea; Vital Images Inc, Minnetonka, Minnesota; and Dextroscope; Bracco AMT Inc, Princeton, NJ).</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The mean (SD) normal orbital volumes calculated by Vitrea and Dextroscope were 25.5 (2.4) mL and 24.8 (3.0) mL, respectively. The average preoperative orbital volumes were 28.3 (2.3) mL and 27.6 (3.1) mL, while the postoperative volumes were 25.8 (2.5) mL and 24.9 (3.0) mL. Vitrea showed that the average volume of displaced orbital soft tissue was 2.8 (1.9) mL before surgery and that it was reduced to 0.3 (1.3) mL after surgery, while Dextroscope showed that the average displaced orbital soft tissue was 2.9 (1.4) mL before surgery and that it was reduced to 0.1 (1.2) mL after surgery. There was no statistical difference between the 3-D analysis programs.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Consistent volume measurements can be obtained using different 3-D image analysis programs. Measuring preoperative and postoperative volume changes and postoperative reduction can ensure a good surgical result and thereby decrease the incidence of enophthalmos. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kwon, J., Barrera, J. E., Jung, T.-Y., Most, S. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Ophthalmology, Ophthalmological Disorders, Eye Injuries/ Ocular Trauma, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Oral/ Maxillofacial Trauma, Radiologic Imaging, Computed Tomography, Facial Plastic Surgery, Oculoplastic Surgery, Reconstructive Facial Surgery, Trauma/ Maxillofacial Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.77</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measurements of Orbital Volume Change Using Computed Tomography in Isolated Orbital Blowout Fractures [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>398</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>395</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/399?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Minimally Invasive Ear Reshaping With a 1450-nm Diode Laser Using Cryogen Spray Cooling in New Zealand White Rabbits [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/399?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Otoplasty is the current standard of care for treating prominent ears, a psychologically and sometimes functionally disabling disorder. The technically demanding procedure carries many risks such as poor aesthetic outcome, need for revision surgery, and need for general anesthesia. This study investigates the use of laser irradiation combined with cryogen skin cooling and stenting to reshape cartilage in the ears of New Zealand white rabbits.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> In this prospective, randomized, internally controlled animal study, the right ears of 9 rabbits were mechanically deformed with a jig and then irradiated with a 1450-nm diode laser combined with cryogen skin cooling (14 J/pulse with cryogen spray for 33 milliseconds per cycle and a 6-mm spot size). The left ear served as the control. The ears were splinted for 1, 3, or 4 weeks. The rabbits were then given a lethal dose of intravenous pentobarbital, and the splints were removed and ears examined and photographed. Light and confocal microscopy were performed on the specimens.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Shape change was observed in all 9 treated rabbit ears, while none of the control ears (stenting alone) showed significant change. Qualitatively, reshaped ears were stiffer after 4 weeks of splinting than after 1 or 3 weeks. None of the rabbits showed evidence of skin injury nor did they show signs of postprocedural pain. Findings from histologic analysis in the treated areas showed evidence of an expanded chondrocyte population in the region of laser irradiation, along with some perichondrial thickening and some fibrosis of the deep dermis. Confocal microscopy revealed minimal cellular death at 1 week and none thereafter.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Cartilage reshaping using laser energy can be performed safely transcutaneously using cryogen spray cooling in rabbits. This animal model has similarity to human ears with regard to skin and cartilage thickness and is a stepping stone toward developing minimally invasive laser auricle reshaping in humans.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holden, P. K., Chlebicki, C., Wong, B. J. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Laser Surgery, Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Biomaterials and Implants, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.17</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Minimally Invasive Ear Reshaping With a 1450-nm Diode Laser Using Cryogen Spray Cooling in New Zealand White Rabbits [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>404</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>399</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/404?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Error in Text in: Margin Reflex Distance in Different Ethnic Groups [Correction]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/404?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Oculoplastic Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.89</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Error in Text in: Margin Reflex Distance in Different Ethnic Groups [Correction]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>404</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>404</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/405?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Defining the Facial Extent of the Platysma Muscle: A Review of 71 Consecutive Face-lifts [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/405?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To delineate the superior (facial) extent of the platysma muscle.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> A total of 142 facial halves were examined from 71 consecutive deep-plane rhytidectomies performed over a period of 3 months. The platysma muscle was identified and isolated during the procedure. The superior extent of the platysma was measured along the line created by the angle of the mandible to the malar eminence, also known as the malar mandibular line.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> On average, the platysma extended 3.98 cm along the malar mandibular line, superiorly from the inferior border of the mandible. The platysma was located 3.09 cm inferiorly from the malar eminence along the malar mandibular line. On average, the platysma muscle occupied 56% of the malar mandibular line.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> The platysma muscle may have a more significant facial extension than previously described.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shah, A. R., Rosenberg, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.82</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Defining the Facial Extent of the Platysma Muscle: A Review of 71 Consecutive Face-lifts [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>408</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>405</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/409?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perspectives on the Evolution of Rhinoplasty [Commentary]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/409?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simons, R. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Rhinoplasty, Humanities, History of Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.85</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perspectives on the Evolution of Rhinoplasty [Commentary]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>411</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>409</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/412?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Legacy of Jack Anderson, MD [Commentary]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/412?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sepehr, A., Adamson, P. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Education, Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Reconstructive Facial Surgery, Rhinoplasty, Humanities]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.81</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Legacy of Jack Anderson, MD [Commentary]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>413</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>412</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/414?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Has the Pendulum Swung Too Far?: Trends in the Teaching of Endonasal Rhinoplasty [Commentary]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/414?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dayan, S., Kanodia, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Education, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Rhinoplasty, Humanities, History of Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.70</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Has the Pendulum Swung Too Far?: Trends in the Teaching of Endonasal Rhinoplasty [Commentary]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>416</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>414</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/416?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measuring Outcomes in Nasal Surgery: Realities and Possibilities [Commentary]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/416?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rhee, J. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Practice, Other, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, General Rhinology, Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Quality of Life, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Rhinoplasty]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.86</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measuring Outcomes in Nasal Surgery: Realities and Possibilities [Commentary]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>419</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>416</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/420?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cultivating a Global Aesthetic Consciousness [Commentary]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/420?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harris, M. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Psychosocial Issues, Facial Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.84</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cultivating a Global Aesthetic Consciousness [Commentary]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>421</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>420</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/421?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rhinoplasty at the Global Crossroads [Commentary]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/421?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apaydin, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Rhinoplasty]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.90</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rhinoplasty at the Global Crossroads [Commentary]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>423</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>421</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/423?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rhinoplasty: A View From the United Kingdom [Commentary]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/423?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rowe-Jones, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Rhinoplasty]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.75</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rhinoplasty: A View From the United Kingdom [Commentary]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>425</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>423</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/426?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Functional Valvular Indrawing [Editor's Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/426?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burstin, P. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General Rhinology, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Rhinoplasty]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.78</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Functional Valvular Indrawing [Editor's Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>427</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>426</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editor's Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/426-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Functional Valvular Indrawing--Reply [Editor's Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/426-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Most, S. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General Rhinology, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Rhinoplasty]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.79</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Functional Valvular Indrawing--Reply [Editor's Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>427</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>426</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editor's Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/428?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals [Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/428?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals [Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>429</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>428</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/436?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cecilia Beaux's Brother and Sister: Charles Sumner Bird and His Sister Edith Bird (Mrs Robert Bass) [Beauty]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/6/436?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collins, E. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Facial Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other, Humanities]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.83</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cecilia Beaux's Brother and Sister: Charles Sumner Bird and His Sister Edith Bird (Mrs Robert Bass) [Beauty]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>437</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>436</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Beauty</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/282?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/282?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>282</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>282</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/284?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery [Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/284?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.63</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery [Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>284</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>284</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/285?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Alar Rim Grafting in Rhinoplasty: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/285?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To determine the potential indications for placement of cartilaginous alar rim grafts in primary and revision septorhinoplasty.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Retrospective medical chart analysis of all patients undergoing septorhinoplasty from March 2003 through June 2004 in a private facial plastic and reconstructive surgery center and a tertiary teaching hospital. Patients who received alar rim grafts were identified. The indications for placement of the alar rim grafts were deduced from their preoperative evaluation and intraoperative assessment as noted in their comprehensive operative notes. Preoperative and postoperative digital photographs as well as postoperative medical records were analyzed for alar contour, pertinent patient complaints, and complications.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> During the 15-month study period, 150 patients underwent septorhinoplasty performed by the senior author. Of these patients, 31 received alar rim grafts. The most frequent indications for placement of alar rim grafts were cephalic malposition of the lower lateral cartilage with inadequate alar support (9 patients [29%]), correction of alar flare (9 patients [29%]), and correction of dynamic alar margin collapse (8 patients [26%]). At a mean 6-month follow-up, there were no graft displacements or extrusion.<b></b></p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Alar rim grafting is a simple and versatile approach to providing additional support to the external nasal valve and for improving nasal base contour.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boahene, K. D. O., Hilger, P. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Rhinoplasty]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.68</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Alar Rim Grafting in Rhinoplasty: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>289</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>285</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/290?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysis of Patient-Determined Preoperative Computer Imaging [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/290?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To compare patients' goals in aesthetic rhinoplasty with aesthetic ideals by analyzing changes requested through computer imaging during the initial consultation.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> The frontal and lateral views of 20 consecutive female rhinoplasty patients were analyzed retrospectively before and after using image manipulation software. Indexes from the frontal view included the ratio of alar base width to dorsal length and the ratio of alar base width to interpupillary distance. On the lateral view, parameters included the nasolabial angle, nasofacial angle, and tip projection (Goode ratio). Ideal parameters were based on descriptions by Powell and Humphreys.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The ideal and patient-determined proportions were compared using a paired 2-tailed <I>t</I> test. The mean nasolabial angle falls within the ideal range before and after image manipulation. However, the Goode ratio and the ratio of alar base width to interpupillary distance were statistically similar to ideal values only after image manipulation. The nasofacial angle and the ratio of alar base width to dorsal length showed a trend toward the ideal ratio.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Patients' preferences were similar to the ideal in 3 of 5 parameters, and the remaining parameters approached the ideal. These parameters are useful in creating satisfying proportions in aesthetic rhinoplasty and reconstructive surgery within our population. Rather than population-based normative data or ideals based on fashion models or Greek statuary, these are proportions requested by patients. Computer imaging software, used by a growing number of aesthetic surgeons, holds a wealth of data regarding common patient preferences.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mahajan, A. Y., Shafiei, M., Marcus, B. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Patient Education/ Health Literacy, Patient-Physician Relationship, Other, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Rhinoplasty]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.61</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysis of Patient-Determined Preoperative Computer Imaging [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>295</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>290</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/296?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Treatment of Nasal Fractures: A Changing Paradigm [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/296?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To compare the efficacy of closed vs open treatment of nasal fractures, and to suggest an algorithm for nasal fracture management that includes closed and open techniques.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Retrospective study of 86 patients with nasal fractures who received either closed treatment (41 patients) or open treatment (45 patients) between January 1, 1997, and December 30, 2007. Fractures were classified as 1 of 5 types. Revision rates were calculated for each group. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were rated, if available, and patients were interviewed about aesthetic, functional, and quality of life issues related to surgical treatment.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The revision rate for all fractures was 6%. The revision rate for closed vs open treatment was 2% vs 9%, respectively. Many closed treatment cases were classified as type II fractures, whereas most open treatment cases were classified as type IV fractures. There was no statistical difference in revision rate, patient satisfaction, or surgeon photographic evaluation scores between the closed and open treatment groups when fractures were treated in the recommended fashion.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Patients who undergo open or closed treatment have similar outcomes if the surgical approach is well matched to the individual fracture. Our treatment algorithm provided consistent aesthetic and functional results while minimizing the need for revision procedures.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ondik, M. P., Lipinski, L., Dezfoli, S., Fedok, F. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, General Rhinology, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Interventions, Other, Facial Plastic Surgery, Nasal Surgery, Reconstructive Facial Surgery, Trauma/ Maxillofacial Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.65</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Treatment of Nasal Fractures: A Changing Paradigm [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>302</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>296</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/303?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Margin Reflex Distance in Different Ethnic Groups [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/303?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To determine the normal range for eyelid margin reflex distance (MRD) in adults according to their ethnicity, age, and sex.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> A prospective study of eyelid measurements in 112 consecutive adult African American, Asian, white, and Latino patients was compared using <I>t</I> test analysis. Measurements of MRD were collected by a single examiner across 5 months. Patients with conditions disposing to eyelid height changes were excluded.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The MRD showed statistically significant variance among select ethnic groups. There was no statistical significance between sexes within each ethnic group.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Variance in MRD exists among ethnic groups. This information and further data on ethnicity and sex variance of eyelid measurements can be used for both diagnostic purposes and surgical treatment of patients for optimal results.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murchison, A. P., Sires, B. A., Jian-Amadi, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Oculoplastic Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.9</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Margin Reflex Distance in Different Ethnic Groups [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>305</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>303</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/306?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improved Skin Paddle Survival in Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/306?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To examine our outcomes with skin paddle survival using pectoralis myocutaneous flaps in reconstruction of the head and neck. The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap has been associated with a notable incidence of distal skin necrosis and flap loss. Our experience has been favorable compared with that reported in the literature.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Retrospective medical record review of 81 cases of pectoralis major muscle flap reconstruction performed in 78 patients from 1995 to 2008 using a flap harvest technique that is slightly different from the classic descriptions. Data were obtained regarding coexisting health conditions and perioperative complications, which were divided into major and minor categories. Major complications were defined as total flap failure or greater than 25% skin paddle loss. Minor complications and donor site complications included fistulas that were managed conservatively, wound dehiscence not requiring additional surgery, local infections, seromas, and hematomas.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Of the 81 flaps performed, 22 complications were encountered. Total flap loss was not encountered in any patient. The overall major complication rate in myocutaneous flaps was 3 of 76 (4%), with these cases consisting of significant skin paddle loss. Minor complications occurred in 14 of 81 myofascial and myocutaneous flaps (17%). Donor site complications of the chest wall occurred in 5 of 81 flaps (6%).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Skin paddle necrosis may be minimized with modifications of the classic technique. We believe that extension of the skin flap over the rectus sheath is the cause of distal skin flap necrosis. The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap remains a valuable reconstructive option in the head and neck.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramakrishnan, V. R., Yao, W., Campana, J. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Cancer Reconstruction of Head & Neck, Facial Plastic Surgery, Reconstructive Facial Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.67</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improved Skin Paddle Survival in Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>310</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>306</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/311?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction of Pollybeak and Dimpling Deformities of the Nasal Tip in the Contracted, Short Nose by the Use of a Supratip Transposition Flap [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/311?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To discuss our experiences with the use of a supratip transposition flap to simultaneously correct pollybeak deformity and nasal tip dimpling.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> From April 1, 2007, through August 31, 2008, 10 Asian women with a contracted, short nose that exhibited nasal tip dimpling were retrospectively included in this study. By use of an open approach, the osteocartilaginous framework was elongated first. If the pollybeak and dimpling deformities of the nasal tip were found after the closure of the transcolumellar incision, a supratip transposition flap was designed to correct the combined deformities over the supratip and nasal tip areas. Finally, bilateral marginal incisions were closed.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The follow-up period ranged from 2 to 16 months, with an average of 5 months. No immediate complications were noted in this small series. Four of 10 patients required minor flap revisions, with satisfactory results attained thereafter. All patients were satisfied with the aesthetic result after scar maturation.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The use of the supratip transposition flap not only corrects pollybeak deformity but also resolves dimpled nasal tip depression. The techniques presented herein add to the armamentarium of revision rhinoplasty surgeons, especially those dedicated to the treatment of the Asian patient who undergoes rhinoplasty.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jung, D.-H., Lin, R. Y.-C., Jang, H.-J., Claravall, H. J., Lam, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Rhinoplasty]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.60</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction of Pollybeak and Dimpling Deformities of the Nasal Tip in the Contracted, Short Nose by the Use of a Supratip Transposition Flap [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>319</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>311</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/320?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of Incision Closures With Subcuticular and Percutaneous Staples [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/320?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> Incision closures should yield safe, effective healing with excellent cosmesis. Subcuticular absorbable staples may combine the advantages of subcuticular suturing with the efficiency of percutaneous stapling. This study compares absorbable subcuticular staples with percutaneous metal staples as a means of incision closure in facial rejuvenation surgery.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Sixteen patients undergoing endoscopic eyebrow-lift and/or rhytidectomy were studied. Each patient had 50% of their temporal and postauricular skin incisions closed with subcuticular staples oversewn with 5-0 plain gut and the remaining 50% closed with percutaneous metal staples. Incisions were evaluated intraoperatively and at regular intervals for 1 year postoperatively. Intraoperative assessments included device handling, bleeding, tension, and cosmesis. Postoperative assessments included incision integrity, inflammation, and cosmesis. Patients were also interviewed regarding incision appearance and comfort.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> During the early postoperative period, metal staples produced greater incisional erythema and crusting. Subcuticular staples produced better tissue eversion, less erythema, equivalent if not superior comfort, and shorter office visits. These differences faded over time. The need to properly engage the subcuticular stapler in the dermis was the principal impediment to optimal stapler use.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Subcuticular staples represent a safe, comfortable, and potentially more rapid alternative to percutaneous staples. Modifications of the subcuticular stapler device are required before its full potential can be realized.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dresner, H. S., Hilger, P. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.44</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of Incision Closures With Subcuticular and Percutaneous Staples [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>326</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>320</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/327?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Meta-analysis of Surgical Techniques for Preventing Parotidectomy Sequelae [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/327?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To conduct a meta-analysis of the literature on surgical methods for the prevention of Frey syndrome and concave facial deformity after parotidectomy.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> A PubMed search through February 2008 identified more than 60 English-language studies involving surgical techniques for prevention of these parameters. Analyzed works included 15 retrospective or prospective controlled studies reporting quantitative data for all included participants for 1 or more of the measured parameters in patients who had undergone parotidectomy. Report quality was assessed by the strength of taxonomy recommendation (SORT) score. Data were directly extracted from reports and dichotomized into positive and negative outcomes. The statistical significance was then calculated.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The mean SORT score for all studies was 2.34, and the mean SORT score for all the analyzed studies was 1.88. Meta-analysis for multiple techniques to prevent symptomatic Frey syndrome, positive starch-iodine test results, and contour deformity favored intervention with a cumulative odds ratio (OR) of 3.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.81-5.34); OR, 3.66 (95% CI; 2.32-5.77); and OR, 5.25 (95% CI, 3.57-7.72), respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Meta-analysis of operative techniques to prevent symptomatic Frey syndrome, positive starch-iodine test results, and facial asymmetry suggests that such methods are likely to reduce the incidence of these complications after parotidectomy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curry, J. M., King, N., Reiter, D., Fisher, K., Heffelfinger, R. N., Pribitkin, E. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Facial Nerve Disorders, Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Medicine, Facial Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.62</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Meta-analysis of Surgical Techniques for Preventing Parotidectomy Sequelae [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>331</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>327</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/332?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Profilometric and Morphometric Response of Murine Skin to Cosmeceutical Agents [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/332?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To investigate whether topical antiaging compounds can reduce wrinkle depth as noted at replica profilometry with comparable changes in histologic findings in hairless mice.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Commercial retinoic acid cream, a peptide lotion, and a soy cream were applied to the dorsal skin for 4 weeks. Silicone-negative replicas of treated and untreated skin surface were photographed and evaluated for traditional features of surface roughness. Skin samples were processed using histomorphometry and immunohistochemistry of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Quantitative light microscopic data were acquired for estimating replication of epidermal keratinocytes, epidermal thickness, and depth of dermal collagen bundles.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Data were analyzed by comparing means with 1-way analysis of variance, and significant changes in all measurements were noted. Augmented keratinocyte proliferation and thickening of viable epidermis were observed with all 3 compounds, although a greater effect was found in the retinoic acid and peptide treatment groups. A similar trend was noted with respect to widening of the collagen layer. Epidermal surface roughness manifested maximum smoothing after treatment with the peptide compound.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> The pronounced effects noted with all 3 compounds indicate that topical agents other than retinoic acid may have comparative stimulating effects on the skin in nonirradiated mice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhattacharyya, T. K., Linton, J., Mei, L., Thomas, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Dermatology, Dermatology, Other, Facial Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.30</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Profilometric and Morphometric Response of Murine Skin to Cosmeceutical Agents [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>337</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>332</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/338?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of the Remnant Ear for Reconstruction in Lobule-Type Microtia [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/338?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To present in detail a reconstruction technique using the remnant ear in lobule-type microtia. </p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> By comparing the location of residual ear and the contralateral normal ear, we classified 3 different types of the remnant ear. Three techniques of transposition were applied to adjust the location of the reconstructed ear.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The reconstructed earlobes not only looked real but also were symmetrical with the contralateral normal ears.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> The remnant ear is a key factor&mdash;in addition to the framework and covering skin&mdash;in ear reconstruction in microtia.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pan, B., Lin, L., Zhao, Y., Zhuang, H., Lu, H., Jiang, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Middle/ External Ear Disorders, Pediatrics, Congenital Malformations, Facial Plastic Surgery, Pediatric Facial Plastic Surgery, Reconstructive Facial Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.66</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of the Remnant Ear for Reconstruction in Lobule-Type Microtia [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>341</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>338</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/343?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Use of Ultrasonic Shears for the Harvest of Perforator Free Flaps [Surgical Technique]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/343?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A retrospective chart review was performed at a university medical center to evaluate the use of ultrasonic shears for the harvest of perforator free flaps over an 18-month period. The anterolateral thigh (ALT) was the perforator free flap site selected for the study. The site of origin and the number of musculocutaneous perforator vessels that were dissected using ultrasonic shears were recorded, and ALT flap viability and wound-healing complications were evaluated to assess safety. Seventeen patients underwent harvest of ALT perforator free flaps. Successful dissection of musculocutaneous perforators was achieved in 96% (27 of 28) of the descending branch perforators and in 100% (9 of 9) of the transverse branch perforators. Flap viability was 100% (17 of 17). We found that ultrasonic shears were effective and safe to use for harvesting perforator free flaps. According to these preliminary findings, the use of ultrasonic shears appears promising, yet further prospective analysis is needed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmed, S., Sidell, D., Blackwell, K. E., Sercarz, J. A., Abemayor, E., Nabili, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Cancer Reconstruction of Head & Neck, Facial Plastic Surgery, Reconstructive Facial Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.64</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Use of Ultrasonic Shears for the Harvest of Perforator Free Flaps [Surgical Technique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>346</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>343</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Surgical Technique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/347?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Facial Anthropometric Analysis of the Javanese Female [Research Letters]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/347?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reksodiputro, M. H., Koento, T., Boedhihartono,  , Sclafani, A. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Women's Health, Women's Health, Other, Facial Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.59</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Facial Anthropometric Analysis of the Javanese Female [Research Letters]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>349</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>347</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/349?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Absorbable Suture Compared With Nonabsorbable Suture in Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Closure [Research Letters]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/349?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaggi, R., Hart, R., Taylor, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Patient-Physician Relationship, Other, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Oculoplastic Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.53</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Absorbable Suture Compared With Nonabsorbable Suture in Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Closure [Research Letters]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>352</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>349</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/354?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals [Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/354?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals [Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>355</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>354</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/360?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Edgar Degas's La Savoisienne [Beauty]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/5/360?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collins, E. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Facial Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other, Humanities]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.58</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Edgar Degas's La Savoisienne [Beauty]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>361</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>360</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Beauty</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/218?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/218?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>218</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>218</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/220?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery [Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/220?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.48</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery [Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>220</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>220</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/221?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Graduated Approach to Refinement of the Nasal Lobule [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/221?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To present a graduated approach to refining the nasal lobule (a frequent complaint during consultations for rhinoplasty) based on anatomic features and to discuss the casuistics of this procedure since we began performing it.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> A retrospective evaluation of the medical charts of 1152 patients who underwent rhinoplasty from 2003 to 2006; 641 patients fulfilled the criteria for our study (55.6%). Outcomes were assessed by comparing preoperative and last follow-up photographs and considering the width, symmetry, and contour of the nasal lobule. Cases were allocated into 7 groups: (1) no surgery on nasal tip; (2) interdomal breakup; (3) cephalic trim; (4) domal suture; (5) shield-shaped graft; (6) vertical dome division; and (7) replacement of lower lateral cartilages.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Of the 641 patients enrolled in the study, 435 were women and 206 were men. Mean follow-up period was 1.5 years. An asymmetric tip was present in 28 patients (4.4%), and a persistent width of interdomal space in 34 (5.3%). None presented overnarrowing of interdomal space. Surgical revision rate to enhance refinement of the lobule was 5.6%.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Our graduated approach has shown excellent outcomes, a high rate of patient satisfaction, and a low rate of revision.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrocinio, L. G., Patrocinio, T. G., Maniglia, J. V., Patrocinio, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Rhinoplasty]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.37</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Graduated Approach to Refinement of the Nasal Lobule [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>229</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>221</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/230?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hand-washing Practices of Facial Plastic Surgeons [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/230?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> (1) To define and characterize knowledge of effective hand hygiene and its scientific basis among practicing facial plastic surgeons; (2) to review the existing literature of, basis for, and guidelines on hand washing in clinical practice; and (3) to motivate and facilitate optimum hand hygiene among facial plastic surgeons.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> National Web-based physician survey and literature review.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> We conducted a national Web-based survey of members of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery regarding general patient safety practices. A subset of the survey assessed physicians' knowledge of hand hygiene, including supporting rationale and actual practices. One hundred and twenty-two facial plastic surgeons of various demographics replied to the online survey. Of these, 65 (53%) correctly knew which hand washing agents are most effective at killing microorganisms, 88 (74%) knew the preferred hand-washing method for visibly soiled hands, and 51 (42%) correctly identified the indications for hand washing.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Adherence to hand hygiene practices is suboptimal among facial plastic surgeons. There seems to be a lack of knowledge regarding indications, methods, and appropriate agents for hand hygiene. Promotion of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines is an important step in increasing hand hygiene compliance among facial plastic surgeons.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leventhal, D. D., Lavasani, L., Reiter, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Infectious Diseases, Other, Medical Practice, Medical Education, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Infections, Facial Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.7</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hand-washing Practices of Facial Plastic Surgeons [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>234</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>230</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/234?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Topic Collections [Announcement]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/234?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.21_a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Topic Collections [Announcement]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>234</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>234</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Announcement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/235?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective Analysis of Outcomes and Complications of 300 Consecutive Microvascular Reconstructions [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/235?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To prospectively follow up patients requiring microvascular reconstruction of head and neck defects to determine preoperative factors predictive of surgical complications.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> A prospectively collected database comprising 300 consecutive microvascular head and neck reconstructions performed by a single surgeon (D.S.A.) in a tertiary care hospital over a 6-year period was reviewed in a retrospective manner. Data collected included preoperative medical and surgical history (presence of documented cardiac disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension) and previous cancer treatment (surgery or radiation therapy). Postoperative data, including early or late complications, hematocrit during hospitalization, and functional status, were also collected. A multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of surgical complications and secondarily crossed to determine the strength of the prediction. Statistical significance was set at <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.05.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Patients were stratified into 4 groups based on (1) previous radiation therapy, (2) previous surgery, (3) no previous radiation therapy or surgery, and (4) both previous radiation therapy and previous surgery, with an increased predictability of complications with both. Diabetes also added to the predictability of complications, with a smaller effect. Cardiac disease and hypertension were not predictive.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Previous radiation therapy and surgery are positive predictors for wound complications after microvascular reconstruction. Diabetes may add further risk in this setting.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nuara, M. J., Sauder, C. L., Alam, D. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Cancer Reconstruction of Head & Neck, Radiation Therapy, Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Infections, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Endocrine Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Facial Plastic Surgery, Reconstructive Facial Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.46</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective Analysis of Outcomes and Complications of 300 Consecutive Microvascular Reconstructions [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>239</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>235</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/239?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[E-mail Alert [Announcement]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/239?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.22_a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[E-mail Alert [Announcement]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>239</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>239</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Announcement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/240?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Utility of Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Submental Fullness in Aging Necks [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/240?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To evaluate the submental region of the aging neck with high-frequency ultrasound and to assess the relative contribution of its various components to the appearance of age-related soft-tissue ptosis.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Ten patients with submental soft-tissue excess were recruited from the senior author's (G.S.K.) private practice. The subcutaneous fat compartment, the subplatysmal fat compartment, and the anterior bellies of the digastric muscles were imaged with high-frequency ultrasound and measured in the cephalocaudal dimension. Pseudoherniation of subplatysmal fat, judged in relation to the inferior surface of the digastric muscles, was also assessed from acquired images.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> A clear delineation of submental anatomy was obtained with ultrasound in all patients (N&nbsp;=&nbsp;10, 100%). Hypertrophied digastric muscles (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;1, 10%) and excessive subplatysmal fat (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;5, 50%) adversely contributed to the appearance of submental fullness in 6 patients (60%). These findings would not have been predicted with the same degree of accuracy from the physical examination alone.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> High-frequency ultrasound provides useful imaging of the submental region and its components. Deeply situated subplatysmal fat and anterior bellies of the digastric muscles, both of which may be difficult to assess on physical examination, can be readily evaluated with ultrasound. When sufficiently enlarged and ptotic, deep tissues of the submental space necessitate an open submentoplasty to restore a youthful neck contour. Preoperative ultrasonography can assist with anatomical imaging of the submental space and help in planning a targeted operative intervention in patients with submental soft-tissue excess.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mashkevich, G., Wang, J., Rawnsley, J., Keller, G. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Radiology of Head & Neck, Radiologic Imaging, Ultrasonography, Facial Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.47</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Utility of Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Submental Fullness in Aging Necks [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>245</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>240</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/245?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Send to a Friend [Announcement]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/245?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2008.533_a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Send to a Friend [Announcement]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>245</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>245</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Announcement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/246?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Techniques for Intraoperative Infiltration of Antibiotics Into Alloplastic Implants for Use in Facial Reconstruction [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/246?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Reconstruction in the head and neck can be difficult owing to the size of the defect or characteristics of the tissue that needs to be replaced. Facial wounds or reconstruction sites can be subject to contamination, thereby risking infection of any implanted material even under ideal circumstances. Particular areas of concern are sites where minimizing the bacterial contamination prior to placing an implant is difficult (eg, the oral cavity and internal nose). Reconstruction involves the facial subcutaneous soft tissue and/or bone, and the ideal implant provides support and natural feel, as well as a low risk of infection. The biocompatibility of alloplastic implants depends on the tissue inertness of the implant and the porosity, allowing connective tissue ingrowth, which in turn decreases the susceptibility to infection. Scalafani et al demonstrated that alloplastic implants contaminated prior to fibrovascular ingrowth had a much higher incidence of infection and rejection.</p>
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To examine the effectiveness of several techniques for infiltrating antibiotics into alloplastic implants of different porosity using 2 commonly used alloplastic implants, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE, or GORE-TEX) and porous high-density polyethylene (Medpor).</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Using an in vitro bacterial growth inhibition model, we found that suction infiltration of the implant with antibiotics was the most effective technique, with a statistically significant advantage over other techniques used. The advantages of the suction impregnation were seen to be most effective using alloplasts with a smaller pore size (20-30 &micro;m) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001), but there was a statistically significant difference even with implants with a larger pore size (150-200 &micro;m) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Suction infiltration of antibiotics into porous implants seems to be the most effective method identified using an in vitro testing protocol. Further experiments will be needed to confirm the effectiveness in reducing the perioperative risk of infection in vivo.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keefe, M. S., Keefe, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Bacterial Infections, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Cancer Reconstruction of Head & Neck, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Plastic Surgery, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other, Facial Plastic Surgery, Biomaterials and Implants, Reconstructive Facial Surgery, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.45</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Techniques for Intraoperative Infiltration of Antibiotics Into Alloplastic Implants for Use in Facial Reconstruction [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>251</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>246</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/251?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Citation Manager [Announcement]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/251?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2008.535_a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Citation Manager [Announcement]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>251</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>251</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Announcement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/252?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Prospective Evaluation of the Efficacy of Topical Adhesive Pads for the Reduction of Facial Rhytids [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/252?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To determine the efficacy of an over-the-counter topical skin adhesive pad for reducing central forehead and glabellar rhytids over a 4-week period.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Prospective series involving 30 healthy volunteers with central forehead and glabellar rhytids at a tertiary care academic medical center. The participants used topical skin adhesive pads over the central forehead area and the glabella for 4 weeks in an effort to reduce rhytids. Before and after treatment, the participants had facial photographs taken and completed a questionnaire assessing the severity of their rhytids. Blinded to the timing of the photographs, 2 independent facial plastic surgeons scored the pretreatment and posttreatment rhytid severity using the Glogau scale (1-4) and a wrinkle severity scale (1-10) to evaluate treatment effect.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Twenty-six participants (87%) completed follow-up with an average of 7.4 hours of use of the topical adhesive pads per night. The independent evaluators found minimal improvements in the Glogau scores (mean [SD], 0.12 [0.33] [<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.08] and 0.06 [0.22] [<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.18] for the central forehead area and the glabella, respectively). The same evaluators also found minimal change in the wrinkle severity scores (mean [SD], 0.21 [1.28] [<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.41] and 0.25 [0.75] [<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.10] out of 10 for central forehead rhytids and glabellar rhytids, respectively). None of these measures were statistically significant. The study participants' self-evaluations demonstrated changes in the wrinkle severity scores of 0.35 (2.10) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.41) in the central forehead area and 0.73 (1.7) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.04) in the glabella.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Subjective self-evaluation of topical adhesive pads demonstrates improvement in glabellar rhytids but may be affected by bias. Independent, blinded evaluation by facial plastic surgeons showed no statistical benefit in the reduction of rhytids in the central forehead area or the glabella.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan, W. R., Most, S. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Dermatology, Dermatology, Other, Facial Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.18</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Prospective Evaluation of the Efficacy of Topical Adhesive Pads for the Reduction of Facial Rhytids [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>256</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>252</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/257?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The "Midface-Lift" as a Misnomer for Correctly Identifying Procedures Designed to Lift and Rejuvenate the Cheeks and Malar Regions of the Face [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/257?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To demonstrate that a classic temporal cheek rhytidectomy results in substantial and acceptable rejuvenation of the so-called midface and that additional surgery is not necessary to improve a sagging cheek, the melolabial fold, and the position of the corner of the mouth and the lateral corner of the eye.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> A retrospective observational study of 53 patients seen at the McCollough Plastic Surgery Clinic between 2005 and 2007. Each patient underwent temporal and cheek face-lifting surgery for various indications. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon, and the surgical technique was identical in all cases. Patient photographs were evaluated by 3 unbiased plastic surgeons who were asked to compare preoperative and postoperative elevation of the cheek mound, melolabial fold, oral commissure, and lateral canthus. Each anatomic area was appraised for improvement by each reviewer using a 4-point scale.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The average patient age was 57 years, and the average patient follow-up was 11 months. Patients achieved excellent or significant improvement in a sagging cheek, melolabial fold, oral commissure, and lateral canthus in 79% (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;42), 70% (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;37), 72% (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;38), and 65% (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;34) of cases, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> It has been written often that standard face-lifting techniques fail to address many of the aging changes seen in the cheeks. Many authors argue that a separate, unique procedure is required to effectively rejuvenate the cheek, nasolabial fold, and corner of the mouth. Our experience is contrary to this notion. The middle third facial rejuvenation can be achieved by our standard temporal cheek face-lift, and the term <I>midface-lift</I> may be a misnomer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCollough, E. G., Scurry, W. C., Shirazi, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Dermatology, Dermatology, Other, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.50</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The "Midface-Lift" as a Misnomer for Correctly Identifying Procedures Designed to Lift and Rejuvenate the Cheeks and Malar Regions of the Face [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>262</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>257</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/262?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Full-text Online Access [Announcement]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/262?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.26_a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Full-text Online Access [Announcement]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>262</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>262</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Announcement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/263?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sculpting Resection of Rhinophyma Using the Shaw Scalpel [Surgical Technique]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/263?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Rhinophyma is a disfiguring disorder of the nasal skin characterized by hypervascularity, sebaceous gland hyperplasia, occluded sebaceous ducts, and dermal fibrosis. It has no known effective medical treatment; however, a myriad of surgical treatments have been reported. We report an effective, efficient, and safe approach to treat this disorder using the Shaw scalpel to surgically sculpt the nose.</p>
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using the Shaw scalpel to treat rhinophyma.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> We performed a retrospective review of 7 male patients (age range, 58-81 years) who underwent primary surgical treatment of rhinophyma with the Shaw scalpel.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> A good to excellent outcome was noted in all 7 patients. No perioperative complications occurred. Essentially no blood loss was noted during or after the procedures.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Use of the Shaw scalpel as the sole surgical instrument and method is a safe, efficient, and effective means to treat rhinophyma.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vural, E., Royer, M. C., Kokoska, M. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Rhinoplasty]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.34</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sculpting Resection of Rhinophyma Using the Shaw Scalpel [Surgical Technique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>266</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>263</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Surgical Technique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/266?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Special Theme Issue: Cancer and the Face [Call for Papers]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/266?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.49_a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Special Theme Issue: Cancer and the Face [Call for Papers]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>266</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Call for Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/267?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[20-Year Experience With the Conrad Modification of the Freer Elevator as a Pull-in Suture Introducer [Surgical Technique]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/267?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A modified Freer elevator was created to aid the safe placement of alloplasts in a subcutaneous dissection pocket. We believe that this innovation represents a better way to insert nonrigid facial alloplasts and grafts and that it contributes to the reduced technique-related complications of migration, kinking, and asymmetry; it also minimizes tissue trauma and unnecessary surgical explorations.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torgerson, C., Conrad, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Plastic Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Facial Plastic Surgery, Biomaterials and Implants, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.36</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[20-Year Experience With the Conrad Modification of the Freer Elevator as a Pull-in Suture Introducer [Surgical Technique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>269</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>267</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Surgical Technique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/271?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Microbiologic Assessment of Multidose Restylane for Facial Augmentation [Research Letters]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/271?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandt, M. G., Al Gilani, M., Balderston, J., Davidson, R., Moore, C. C., Taylor, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Bacterial Infections, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.31</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Microbiologic Assessment of Multidose Restylane for Facial Augmentation [Research Letters]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>273</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/273?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Error in Legend in: A Novel Bioabsorbable Device for Facial Suspension and Rejuvenation [Correction]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/273?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Biomaterials and Implants, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.52</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Error in Legend in: A Novel Bioabsorbable Device for Facial Suspension and Rejuvenation [Correction]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>273</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>273</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/274?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals [Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/274?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals [Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>275</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>274</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/275?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[References [Announcement]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/275?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.27_a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[References [Announcement]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>275</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>275</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Announcement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/280?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Childe Hassam's Portrait of Adelaide Christina Meyer, 1913 [Beauty]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/4/280?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collins, E. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:54:43 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Facial Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other, Humanities]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.38</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Childe Hassam's Portrait of Adelaide Christina Meyer, 1913 [Beauty]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>281</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>280</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Beauty</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/154?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/154?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:52 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>154</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>154</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/156?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery [Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/156?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.32</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery [Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>156</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>156</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/157?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of Midfacial Asymmetry on Nasal Axis Deviation: Indications for Use of the Subalar Graft [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/157?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To test the hypothesis that midfacial asymmetry specifically relevant to nasal tip deviation will be reflected in the measured soft-tissue attachments of the ala to the face.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective photographic analysis of 35 consecutive patients seeking functional or aesthetic nasal surgery regardless of cause.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Nasal axis had a significant correlation with the alar-facial angle on base view photographs (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) irrespective of cause (traumatic vs congenital). However, there was no significant correlation between alar facial angle on anteroposterior view (frontal) with nasal axis and no correlation between frontal and basal angles.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Soft-tissue analysis demonstrates a relationship between nasal axis deviation and lower midfacial asymmetry or hypoplasia.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yao, F., Lawson, W., Westreich, R. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, General Rhinology, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Rhinoplasty]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of Midfacial Asymmetry on Nasal Axis Deviation: Indications for Use of the Subalar Graft [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>164</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>157</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/165?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Facial Fractures in Motor Vehicle Collisions: Epidemiological Trends and Risk Factors [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/165?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To analyze epidemiological trends in facial fractures sustained in motor vehicle collisions and to identify the effects of occupant and crash-specific characteristics on the likelihood of injury.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> A retrospective cohort analysis of vehicle occupants with facial fractures following a motor vehicle crash was performed using the population-based 1993-2005 National Automotive Sampling System Crashworthiness Data System database. Injury trends were analyzed by calendar year and vehicle model year. A multivariate analysis was performed on biomechanical, demographic, and safety restraint data, with the calculation of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The incidence of facial fractures was found to be decreasing (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.01), along with a declining probability of injury with newer car models (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.01). Seat belts with frontal air bag use were associated with a significantly decreased probability of facial fracture (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.09-0.22). Air bags alone were not associated with a reduced probability of injury (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58-1.06). Side impacts (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.14-2.86) and mismatch in the sizes of the crash vehicles (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.27-3.12) were associated with increased risk of facial fractures.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The probability of facial fractures from motor vehicle collisions is decreasing. This finding may be due to design improvements implicitly related to vehicle model year. Restraint use continues to be important for injury prevention, while factors such as changes in vehicle fleet composition may alter injury trends.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McMullin, B. T., Rhee, J. S., Pintar, F. A., Szabo, A., Yoganandan, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Public Health, Injury Prevention & Control, Facial Plastic Surgery, Nasal Surgery, Trauma/ Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.11</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Facial Fractures in Motor Vehicle Collisions: Epidemiological Trends and Risk Factors [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>170</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>165</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/170?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[References [Announcement]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/170?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.27</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[References [Announcement]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>170</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>170</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Announcement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/171?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Free Tissue Reconstruction Following Excision of Head and Neck Arteriovenous Malformations [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/171?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To evaluate free tissue transfer (FTT) as a safe and effective reconstructive technique to treat arteriovenous malformations. Vascular lesions that present a significant clinical challenge to the head and neck reconstructive surgeon are often difficult to treat and can leave large, complex defects.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Retrospective, single-institution case series.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> We describe 8 patients treated for extensive lesions in various parts of the head and neck reconstructed with free flaps. These malformations have a tendency to recur, which was the case in 75% of our patients (6 of 8) during a mean follow-up period of 5 years. Revision procedures are expected at a mean rate of 6.75 per person in our series.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Arteriovenous malformations are uncommon and challenging lesions. Use of FTT can ameliorate the large defects resulting from excision of these lesions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hartzell, L. D., Stack, B. C., Yuen, J., Vural, E., Suen, J. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Dermatology, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Dermatologic Disorders, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Plastic Surgery, Transplantation, Transplantation, Other, Vascular Malformations, Facial Plastic Surgery, Reconstructive Facial Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.6</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Free Tissue Reconstruction Following Excision of Head and Neck Arteriovenous Malformations [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>177</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>171</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/178?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Thread-lift for Facial Rejuvenation: Assessment of Long-term Results [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/178?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To evaluate the long-term success of the thread-lift procedure for facial rejuvenation.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Thirty-three patients underwent a thread-lift procedure alone or in combination with other facial rejuvenation procedures to the brow, midface, jowl, and neck. Ten patients underwent thread-lifts only, and 23 had thread-lifts with other procedures. Ten additional patients having had non&ndash;thread-lift rejuvenation procedures, including lipotransfer, chemical peels, and rhytidectomies, were randomly designated as controls. The mean follow-up period was 21 months (range, 12-31 months). Photodocumentation was obtained at each visit. Long-term aesthetic results were evaluated by 4 independent, blinded, and board-certified facial plastic surgeons. Each result was graded on a scale of 0 to 3, with 0 indicating no change; 1, minimal improvement; 2, moderate improvement; and 3, considerable improvement. The population was divided into 3 groups for comparison. Two-tailed <I>t</I> test (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.05) was used for statistical analysis of aesthetic outcomes.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Although aesthetic improvement was noted in all groups at 1 month, measurable results persisted to the end of the study for all but the group that underwent the thread-lift procedure only. Aesthetic improvement scores of the non&ndash;thread-lift control group were better than the group that underwent thread-lift only. Similarly, when the thread-lift was combined with other procedures, scores were better than when thread-lift was used alone. Statistical significance was demonstrated in both of these comparisons (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.01).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The thread-lift provides only limited short-term improvement that may be largely attributed to postprocedural edema and inflammation. Our results objectively demonstrate the poor long-term sustainability of the thread-lift procedure. Given these findings, as well as the measurable risk of adverse events and patient discomfort, we cannot justify further use of this procedure for facial rejuvenation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abraham, R. F., DeFatta, R. J., Williams, E. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.10</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Thread-lift for Facial Rejuvenation: Assessment of Long-term Results [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>183</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>178</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/183?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Topic Collections [Announcement]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/183?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.21</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Topic Collections [Announcement]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>183</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>183</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Announcement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/184?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nitrogen Plasma Skin Regeneration and Aesthetic Facial Surgery: Multicenter Evaluation of Concurrent Treatment [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/184?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To evaluate the safety and efficacy of aesthetic facial surgery with concurrent nitrogen plasma skin regeneration.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> During a 28-month period, we independently completed 272 concurrent procedures in 95 patients aged 42 to 80 years in whom nitrogen plasma skin regeneration was performed immediately on completion of various aesthetic procedures, including brow-lift, blepharoplasty, lateral canthoplasty, midface-lift, rhytidectomy, cheek augmentation, lip vermillion advancement, filler injections, and augmentation mentoplasty. The treatment variables evaluated included nitrogen plasma pulse energy, pass number, and pulse count, and outcomes monitored included complications and subjective aesthetic improvement.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The various treatment combinations were well tolerated at all anatomical sites. Rhytidectomy flap treatment included escalation of single-pass low-energy to high-energy nitrogen plasma treatment. Although perioperative complications did not otherwise negatively affect results, they included erythema with acneiform eruption (in 2 patients) and presumed herpes simplex virus infection, brief healing delay, and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (in 1 patient each). In general, the treatment combinations were synergistic.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Combining nitrogen plasma skin regeneration with aesthetic facial surgery enhances outcomes for procedures in the forehead and in the periorbital, midface, and perioral regions. It does not seem to increase the risk of dermatologic or surgical complications for the procedures described herein.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holcomb, J. D., Kent, K. J., Rousso, D. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Dermatology, Dermatology, Other, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.29</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nitrogen Plasma Skin Regeneration and Aesthetic Facial Surgery: Multicenter Evaluation of Concurrent Treatment [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>193</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>184</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/193?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Full-text Online Access [Announcement]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/193?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.20</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Full-text Online Access [Announcement]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>193</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>193</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Announcement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/194?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Domal Stabilization Suture in Tip Rhinoplasty [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/194?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To investigate use of the domal stabilization suture as a complementary suture modification technique for refining and securing the nasal tip.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> A single permanent or absorbable suture is placed via an open or cartilage delivery approach. The suture is placed along the cephalic borders of the domes at the medial third of the lateral crura bilaterally just posterior to the junction of the intermediate and lateral crura as a final step in tip rhinoplasty.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The domal stabilization suture provided a means to help maintain dome symmetry in the setting of variable healing and scarring forces with no complications and no effect on tip rotation or projection.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Use of the domal stabilization suture enables correction of subtle changes in mild tip asymmetry and irregularities in domal height and provides subtle narrowing of the interdomal distance.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corrado, A., Bloom, J. D., Becker, D. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Rhinoplasty]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.15</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Domal Stabilization Suture in Tip Rhinoplasty [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>197</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>194</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/198?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of Rhinoplasty on Objective Measurement and Psychophysical Appreciation of Facial Symmetry [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/198?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To determine the impact of rhinoplasty on the objective measurement and subjective appreciation of facial symmetry and to investigate whether perceptual shifts are correlated with objective changes in facial proportions.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Frontal view photographs were used to measure bilateral symmetry ratios of the medial and lateral canthi, tragus, ala, and oral commissure in 100 patients before and 6 months after rhinoplasty. Gestalt dichotomous impressions of facial symmetry were also obtained in all cases. Paired <I>t</I> tests and <sup>2</sup> tests were used to compare facial proportions and the proportion of faces perceived as symmetrical, respectively, before and after surgery. The receiver operating characteristic and analysis of variance were used to assess whether perceptual shifts in symmetry could be correlated with objectively measurable changes in facial proportion.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The number of faces perceived as symmetrical increased from 42 to 62 after rhinoplasty (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001, <sup>2</sup> test). Objectively, midline-to-ala symmetry increased from an average of 91.1% (5.5%) (mean [SD]) to 93.8% (4.5%) after rhinoplasty (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001, paired <I>t</I> test). Other facial proportions did not change significantly (<I>P</I>&nbsp;>&nbsp;.10). The degree of change in midline-to-ala symmetry was the only objective measure that was significantly associated with the subjective perception of the face as symmetrical or asymmetrical (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.01, 1-way analysis of variance). Most positive perceptual shifts were associated with an objective improvement in nasal symmetry that was greater than 2%. Conversely, most negative perceptual shifts were associated with minimal postoperative improvement or loss of nasal symmetry.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Rhinoplasty leads to objectively measurable changes in nasal symmetry that correspond with psychophysical modifications in the perception of a face as symmetrical or asymmetrical.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nouraei, S. A. R., Pulido, M. A., Saleh, H. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Patient-Physician Relationship, Other, Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Rhinoplasty]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.33</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of Rhinoplasty on Objective Measurement and Psychophysical Appreciation of Facial Symmetry [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>202</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>198</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/202?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[E-mail Alert [Announcement]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/202?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.22</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[E-mail Alert [Announcement]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>202</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>202</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Announcement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/203?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction of the Secondary Bilateral Cleft Lip Deformity Encountered in Guatemala [Research Letters]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/203?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deleyiannis, F. W.-B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pediatrics, Congenital Malformations, Public Health, World Health, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Pediatric Facial Plastic Surgery, Reconstructive Facial Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2008.523</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction of the Secondary Bilateral Cleft Lip Deformity Encountered in Guatemala [Research Letters]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>205</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>203</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/205?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Objective Comparison of 35-mm Film and Digital Camera Image Quality: A New Gold Standard [Research Letters]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/205?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton, G. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Facial Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.28</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Objective Comparison of 35-mm Film and Digital Camera Image Quality: A New Gold Standard [Research Letters]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>209</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>205</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/209?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rhinobase: A Comprehensive Database, Facial Analysis, and Picture-Archiving Software for Rhinoplasty [Research Letters]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/209?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apaydin, F., Akyildiz, S., Hecht, D. A., Toriumi, D. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Informatics/ Internet in Medicine, Informatics, Other, Facial Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures, Nasal Surgery, Rhinoplasty]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.35</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rhinobase: A Comprehensive Database, Facial Analysis, and Picture-Archiving Software for Rhinoplasty [Research Letters]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>211</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/212?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals [Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/212?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals [Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>213</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>212</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Abstracts: In Other Archives Journals</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/213?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advanced Search [Announcement]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/213?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.26</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advanced Search [Announcement]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>213</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>213</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Announcement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/216?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Edouard Manet's Le Repos [Beauty]]]></title>
<link>http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/11/3/216?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collins, E. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Facial Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other, Humanities]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archfacial.2009.19</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Edouard Manet's Le Repos [Beauty]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>217</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>216</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Beauty</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>