This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Facial Plastic Surgery  • Nasal Surgery  • Reconstructive Facial Surgery  • Alert me on articles by topic

S. M. Ammar, MD; R. W. Westreich, MD; W. Lawson, DDS

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006;8:213-216.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

INTRODUCTION

With recent exception, the history of septal surgery has predominantly been characterized by a slow progression toward conservatism. The earliest techniques used transmucosal reductions of deviations. As with all new surgical approaches, long-term complication rates and failures began to emerge. The resulting problems of septal perforation and nasal collapse prompted the development of the submucous resection technique by Freer¹ and Killian,² which was less radical in nature, preserving a mucoperichondrial cover.^1-2 This allowed for manipulation of the cartilaginous and bony septal framework without violating the integrity of the septal mucosa. Although this was a significant advance for intranasal surgery, limitations existed and long-term results were unsatisfactory in selected cases. In severely deviated and externally deviated noses, the submucous resection was unable to address the most dorsal component of the quadrangular plate.

Poor functional results and persistent nasal obstruction resulted . . . [Full Text of this Article]

TECHNIQUE

COMMENT

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Author Affiliations: Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston (Dr Ammar); and Departments of Otolaryngology, SUNY-Downstate Medical Center (Dr Westreich), and Mount Sinai Hospital (Dr Lawson), New York, NY.