This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Reconstructive Facial Surgery  • Alert me on articles by topic

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Ysunza A, Pamplona C, Ramirez E, Molina F, Mendoza M, Silva A
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:1401-1407

Residual velopharyngeal insufficiency after palatal repair varies from 10 to 20 percent in most centers. Secondary velopharyngeal surgery to correct residual velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with cleft palate is a topic frequently discussed in the medical literature. Several authors have reported that varying the operative approach according to the findings of videonasopharyngoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy significantly improved the success of velopharyngeal surgery. This article compares two surgical techniques for correcting residual velopharyngeal insufficiency, namely pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty. Both techniques were carefully planned according to the findings of videonasopharyngoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy. Fifty patients with cleft palate and residual velopharyngeal insufficiency were randomly divided into two groups: 25 in group 1 and 25 in group 2. Patients in group 1 were operated on by using a customized pharyngeal flap according to the findings . . . [Full Text of this Article]

COMMENTARY

S. A. Tatum, MD
Syracuse, NY