This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5:164-165.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Editor's Note: There have been a number of recent articles in the Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery discussing forehead fixation and the optimal methods and time for such fixation in the endoscopic forehead lift. Drs Sclafani, Romo, and Fozo in their Brief Communication in this issue comment on the varying conclusions drawn. In their brief Commentary, Drs Isse and Sayah point out some of the complexities involved in developing an animal model that will accurately reflect the clinical situation. In spite of limitations, it is important to develop such models to understand the underlying biomechanical situation. We look forward to publishing more definitive studies based on the sound scientific foundation of these researchers. Wayne F. Larrabee, Jr, MD Editor

I WOULD LIKE to commend Dr Kriet and his associates¹ as well as Dr Sclafani and his group² for their research on periosteal adhesion to the cranium. With the growing popularity . . . [Full Text of this Article]

RELATED ARTICLE

Periosteal Healing
Anthony P. Sclafani, Thomas Romo, III, and Michael Fozo
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5(2):202.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Determination of Shear Strength of Periosteum Attached to Bone With BioGlue Surgical Adhesive
Sidle and Maas
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008;10:316-320.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT