You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 9 No. 6, Nov-Dec 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures
 •Oculoplastic Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Prevention of Lower Eyelid Malposition After Blepharoplasty

Anatomic and Technical Considerations of the Inside-Out Blepharoplasty

David B. Rosenberg, MD; Jessica Lattman, MD; Anil R. Shah, MD

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;9(6):434-438.

Objective  To determine the position of the lower eyelid and lateral canthus after release of the lower eyelid retractors with the "inside-out technique" by measuring the marginal reflex distance 2 (MRD2) and using the lateral canthal rounding scale.

Design  Retrospective analysis.

Results  Of the 171 patients who underwent inside-out blepharoplasty, 78 were followed up for 3 months. Preoperative MRD2 was 0.942 pixels. Postoperatively, the modified MRD2 was 0.903. Although the score of the modified MRD2 was found to decrease postoperatively, the decrease was not statistically significant (P < .07). The lateral rounding scale reviewed an average preoperative score of 2.04 and a postoperative score of 1.99. There was no statistical difference between pre- and postoperative observations based on a 1-tailed t test. No complications were reported.

Conclusion  Using photographic analysis, the study found no difference in lateral canthal shape or MRD2 before and after surgery in patients who underwent inside-out blepharoplasty.


Author Affiliations: Division of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Rosenberg and Shah), and the Division of Oculoplastic Surgery, Department of Ophthalmology (Dr Lattman), Manhattan Eye, Ear, & Throat Hospital, New York, New York; and the Division of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York (Dr Shah).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Orbital and Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery Theme Issue
Goldberg
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1708-1709.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.