You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 9 No. 2, Mar-Apr 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Trauma/ Maxillofacial Surgery
 •Facial Plastic Surgery, Other
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Mechanical and Clinical Rationale of Prototype Bone Reduction Forceps

Brendan A. Kluszynski, MD; Andre M. Wineland, BA; Mimi S. Kokoska, MD

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;9(2):106-109.

Objective  To describe the mechanical rationale and clinical application of prototype right-angle reduction forceps.

Methods  A pair of prototype right-angle reduction forceps was designed and manufactured specifically to improve the consistency and ease of fracture reduction. It was used to reduce mandible fractures of the mandible body, parasymphysis, and symphysis in 4 patients. The fractures ranged from minimally displaced to comminuted and displaced fractures.

Results  The pilot monocortical holes used for insertion of the right-angle reduction forceps into the mandible were easier to drill than the old method of drilling angled holes for standard reduction forceps. The older method required constant guesswork as to the correct angle of the hole relative to the tines of the curved reduction forceps. The right-angle reduction forceps required no guesswork because the pilot hole is drilled at a right angle to the surface of the outer bone cortex and at more than 1 cm laterally on each side of the fracture line. There were no episodes of outer cortical bone avulsion or any necessity for redrilling new pilot holes. These forceps provided sufficient force for excellent reduction of the fracture edges. The design also provided improved access for plating superior and inferior to its shaft while it was engaged.

Conclusions  Although curved bony reduction forceps are standard in most mandibular plating sets, they provide less predictable and efficient reduction of fractures than the right-angle reduction forceps. Prototype reduction forceps require little to no additional training to use properly.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Dr Kluszynski), and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock (Mr Wineland and Dr Kokoska); and Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Surgical Services, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock (Dr Kokoska).







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.