You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 8 No. 5, Sep-Oct 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Video Supplement
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery
 •Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures
 •Nasal Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Alar Expansion and Reinforcement

A New Technique to Manage Nasal Valve Collapse

Martyn S. Mendelsohn, FRACS; Kambiz Golchin, MMed (Sci), FRCS

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006;8:293-299.

Objective  To describe the new technique of alar expansion and reinforcement as a comprehensive approach to the surgical management of nasal valve collapse.

Methods  Alar expansion and reinforcement expands the narrow nasal valve and reinforces the floppy nasal sidewall. Forty-one patients underwent rhinoplastic surgery for nasal valve collapse between May 1, 2002, and April 30, 2005, using an external rhinoplasty approach; of these, 32 responded to our postoperative questionnaire. Twenty-four patients (75%) underwent primary surgery and 8 (25%) had undergone previous rhinoplasty. All patients had permanent adjustable expansion sutures. Twelve patients (38%) had an excessively floppy nasal sidewall that required a high-density porous polyethylene alar batten implant to anchor the expansion sutures. Patients underwent clinical review from 6 months to 3 years after surgery, and a telephone survey was used to evaluate their functional and cosmetic satisfaction rates.

Results  Thirty patients (94%) experienced good improvement in their nasal airway. The improvement in nasal airway patency was statistically significant (P<.001). Two patients (6%) reported no improvement. There were no complications. Cosmetic outcome was satisfactory in all 8 patients who also requested cosmetic improvement. Of the 24 patients who had surgery for nasal obstruction only, 10 (42%) rated their cosmetic appearance as better, with the remaining 14 (58%) indicating that they did not identify any significant change in their nasal appearance.

Conclusion  Alar expansion and reinforcement is a safe, reliable, and effective technique to manage nasal valve collapse.


Author Affiliations: Stuart Clinic, Sydney, Australia (Dr Mendelsohn and Mr Golchin). Mr Golchin is now a consultant otolaryngologist and facial plastic surgeon for Beacon Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Trends in Functional Rhinoplasty
Most
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008;10:410-413.
FULL TEXT  

Intranasal Z-plasty for Internal Nasal Valve Collapse
Dutton and Neidich
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008;10:164-168.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.