You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 7 No. 6, Nov-Dec 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatric Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Reconstructive Facial Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Distraction Osteogenesis for Cleft Palate Closure in a Canine Model

Robert J. Tibesar, MD; Eric J. Moore, MD; Uldis Bite, MD

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;7:398-404.

Objective  To assess the utility of distraction osteogenesis (DO) when applied to closure of a hard palate cleft in dogs.

Methods  A midline hard palate cleft was created in 10 mature dogs. Two were controls and had no distraction; the other 8 dogs underwent osteotomies with installation of customized DO devices to the hard palate. After a 10-day latency, distraction commenced at 1 mm/d. After a 14-day consolidation period, the device was removed and the mucosa closed. Each dog was injected with fluorochrome labels and serially killed at 2-week intervals. Bone healing was analyzed further with traditional histologic analysis and fluorochrome labeling.

Results  No serious complications occurred. Bone resorption and cleft widening occurred in both control dogs. Complete bone closure of the hard palate cleft was achieved with DO in 5 of 8 experimental dogs. Three experimental dogs had bone resorption and incomplete palatal closure.

Conclusions  The application of DO techniques in closure of a hard palate cleft in a canine model is safe and well tolerated. Furthermore, in some cases, it proved effective in achieving bony closure of the cleft. Further investigation is warranted into innovative use of DO in treating children born with cleft palate.


Author Affiliations: Department of Otorhinolaryngology (Drs Tibesar and Moore) and Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Dr Bite), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.


RELATED ARTICLE

Limitations of Distraction Osteogenesis in Children
Craig W. Senders
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;7(6):405.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Limitations of Distraction Osteogenesis in Children
Senders
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7:405-405.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.