You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 7 No. 2, Mar-Apr 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures
 •Dermabrasion/ Chemical Peels
 •Nasal Surgery
 •Rhinoplasty
 •Alert me on articles by topic

A Simplified Approach to Alar Base Reduction

A Review of 124 Patients Over 20 Years

Russell W. H. Kridel, MD; Richard D. Castellano, MD

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;7:81-93.

Objectives  To simplify the approach and diagnosis of alar base reduction, suggest a treatment algorithm, and evaluate the long-term outcomes of 3 different techniques used separately or in conjunction with one another.

Design  Retrospective review of 124 patients seen in a private practice by a single surgeon. Patients ranged in age from 15 to 59 years (mean age, 30.4 years). Patients were undergoing primary (83.9%) or revision (16.1%) procedures.

Results  Of the 124 patients undergoing alar base reduction, 31 (25%) were male and 93 (75%) were female. Average follow-up was 2 years. All patients underwent wedge excision, and for 64 patients (51.6%), this was the only technique used on the alar base. Alar wedge and nasal sill excisions were performed in 21 patients (16.9%); 19 (15.3%) underwent alar wedge excision with V-Y advancement, and 20 (16.1%) underwent alar wedge excision, nasal sill excision, and V-Y advancement. Thirty-one patients (25.0%) received dermabrasion for notable postoperative incision scars.

Conclusions  The data represent the senior author’s outcomes of alar base reductions over the past 20 years. The 3 techniques we describe have been effective when used alone or in combination in reducing alar flare and in narrowing the nasal base. Patients should be counseled that dermabrasion of the wedge excision areas in the alar-facial groove may be necessary to diminish visible scars.


Author Affiliations: Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston (Dr Kridel); and Department of Otolaryngology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Dr Castellano).


RELATED ARTICLES

The Long-term Effects of Alar Base Reduction
Garrett H. Bennett, Alexis Lessow, Phil Song, and Minas Constantinides
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;7(2):94-97.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Alar Base Reduction
Peter A. Adamson
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;7(2):98.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Perspectives on the Evolution of Rhinoplasty
Simons
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009;11:409-411.
FULL TEXT  

Incidence of Alarplasty in Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty in a Private Practice Setting
Saltman and Pearlman
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009;11:114-118.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nasal Base Narrowing: The Combined Alar Base Excision Technique
Foda
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007;9:30-34.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Alar Base Reduction
Adamson
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7:98-98.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.