You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 7 No. 2, Mar-Apr 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Special Topics
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Reconstructive Facial Surgery
 •Medical Education
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Interest in Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Among Otorhinolaryngologists

A Survey in the Netherlands

Sors A. T. van Pinxteren, MD; Peter J. F. M. Lohuis, MD, PhD; Koen J. A. O. Ingels, MD, PhD; Gilbert J. Nolst Trenité, MD, PhD

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;7:138-142.

Objective  To assess the interest of Dutch otorhinolaryngologists in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS).

Methods  We conducted a 22-question survey among otorhinolaryngology physicians and residents concerning their experience with and interest in FPRS. The response rate was 71% (335/475; 275 physicians and 60 residents).

Results  Most respondents associated FPRS with rhinoplasty, otoplasty, and the reconstruction of skin cancer defects. Of the physicians, 81% said that 1% to 33% of their practice involves FPRS; 62% were satisfied with this percentage, whereas 36% would like it to be higher. Approximately 70% of physicians regarded their training in FPRS as insufficient, although most (70%) had taken supplementary courses. Moreover, 73% of the otorhinolaryngology physicians and 72% of all respondents said that FPRS should be taught during and after residency, with a preference for hands-on courses. Finally, 84% of all respondents thought that FPRS should be part of the field of otorhinolaryngology, whereas 48% thought that it should become a subspecialty.

Conclusion  There is interest in integrating FPRS training into the Dutch otorhinolaryngology residency program, as it is in the United States.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Central Military Hospital, Utrecht (Dr van Pinxteren), Academic Medical Center, Center for Facial Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, Amsterdam (Drs Lohuis and Nolst Trenité), and University Medical Center, Nijmegen (Dr Ingels), the Netherlands.


RELATED ARTICLE

Perceptions Regarding Facial Plastic Surgery Among Dutch Otolaryngologists
J. Regan Thomas
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;7(2):143-144.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Perceptions Regarding Facial Plastic Surgery Among Dutch Otolaryngologists
Thomas
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7:143-144.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.