You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 6 No. 5, Sep-Oct 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Biomaterials and Implants
 •Reconstructive Facial Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Experimental Facial Augmentation With Hydroxyapatite Cement

Mimi S. Kokoska, MD; Craig D. Friedman, MD; Richard D. Castellano, MD; Peter D. Costantino, MD

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6:290-294.

Objective  To study the results of implantation of preformed hydroxyapatite (HA) disks and HA cement in onlay augmentation.

Methods  In this prospective study involving 16 adult New Zealand rabbits, HA disk and HA cement samples were implanted separately and together along the bony and cartilaginous nasal dorsum as well as over the supraorbital bone. Gross and histologic examinations of the implants were performed at intervals ranging from 3 to 24 months.

Results  There was no evidence of infection, adverse reaction, or implant extrusion in the 15 rabbits surviving the planned period. Grossly, all rabbits had prominent noses and supraorbital regions that were immobile on digital palpation. No measurable change in HA disk height and width was noted but there was a 15% decrease in height and width in the HA cement implant. Microscopically, preformed HA disks were found to be enclosed in a vascularized fibrous capsule. When disks were combined with HA cement, a vascular fibrous capsule was still noted around the implant but there was osteoconversion in the underlying cement layer. Used alone, HA cement underwent both osteoconversion and osteointegration. Neither the preformed HA disk with and without HA cement nor the HA cement alone elicited giant cell reaction or inflammatory changes. The HA cement alone was found to have microscopic fissures at the edges.

Conclusion  This animal study suggests that preformed HA implants and HA cement, alone or in combination, can be used to augment the non–stress-bearing craniofacial skeleton.


From the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System and the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock (Dr Kokoska); Yale–New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Conn (Dr Friedman); and Department of Graduate Medical Education, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Dr Castellano). Dr Costantino is in private practice in New York, NY, and is a consultant for Stryker-Leibinger Corp.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.