You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 6 No. 1, Jan-Feb 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Deep-Plane Face-lift vs Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Plication Face-lift

A Comparative Study

Ferdinand F. Becker, MD; Benjamin A. Bassichis, MD

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6:8-13.

Objective  To evaluate deep-plane face-lift vs superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) plication face-lift in correcting the melolabial fold, jowl, and cheek areas of the face in short-term follow-up.

Design  Masked, randomized review by 4 board-certified facial plastic surgeons experienced in rhytidectomy of full-face (frontal, oblique, and lateral views) before-and-after photographs of 20 patients who underwent deep-plane face-lift and 20 who underwent SMAS plication face-lift. Participants rated the melolabial fold, jowl, and cheek areas for overall correction of the deformities pertaining to the aesthetic results for deep-plane vs SMAS plication face-lift. Categories were excellent, good, average, acceptable, and poor.

Results  Three categories of results were determined: best, average, and poorest. Overall, SMAS plication face-lifts scored higher than deep-plane face-lifts. In the best category, there were more SMAS plication face-lifts. In the average category, there were more deep-plane face-lifts. In the poorest category, there were equal numbers of deep-plane and SMAS face-lifts. Patients were divided into the following age groups: 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and 70 to 80 years. In the 2 younger groups, SMAS face-lifts scored higher than deep-plane face-lifts. In the oldest group, deep-plane face-lifts scored slightly higher than SMAS face-lifts.

Conclusion  Deep-plane face-lift does not seem to offer superior results over SMAS plication face-lift in patients younger than 70 years.


From the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine at Gainesville (Dr Becker); the Advanced Facial Cosmetic and Laser Surgery Center, Vero Beach, Fla (Dr Becker); and the Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago (Dr Bassichis).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Limited vs Extended Face-lift Techniques: Objective Analysis of Intraoperative Results.
Litner and Adamson
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006;8:186-190.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System vs Deep-Plane Face-lift.
Becker
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006;8:191-192.
FULL TEXT  

Safety of Face-lifts in the Older Patient
Becker and Castellano
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:311-314.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is Deep-Plane Face-lift Better Than Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Plication Face-lift?
Baker
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:14-15.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.