You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 6 No. 1, Jan-Feb 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Facial Plastic Surgery, Other
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Patient Education/ Health Literacy
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Informed Consent in Facial Plastic Surgery

Effectiveness of a Simple Educational Intervention

Ara Samuel Makdessian, MD, FRCSC; David A. F. Ellis, MD, FRCSC; Jonathan C. Irish, MD, FRCSC

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6:26-30.

Objective  To evaluate the effectiveness of oral communication about the risks of facial cosmetic procedures compared with oral and written communication.

Design  A prospective randomized study conducted in an ambulatory surgery center. One hundred twenty consecutive patients were included; they presented for consultation for rhinoplasty, rhytidectomy, or laser resurfacing. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: (1) those receiving oral discussion of the risks of the procedure and (2) those receiving oral and written communication about the risks. Two weeks after the initial consultation, patients were surveyed for recall of the risks.

Results  The group that received a pamphlet had a better risk recall than the group that did not (2.5 vs1.5 of 5 risks; P<.001). The recall rate in the following groups that received a pamphlet was also better: (1) university-educated patients (P = .02), (2) patients who underwent rhinoplasty (P<.001), (3) patients who underwent laser resurfacing (P = .02), and (4) female patients (P<.001).

Conclusions  Written disclosure of the risks of cosmetic procedures enables patients to retain and understand more clearly those potential risks. They are, therefore, able to give an informed consent to the proposed procedure. This study also identifies patient groups who may require more intensive presurgical teaching. The medicolegal implications are apparent.


From the West-Med Facial Cosmetic Surgery Center, Plantation, Fla (Dr Makdessian); and the Department of Otolaryngology, University of Toronto (Drs Ellis and Irish), About Face Surgi-Center (Dr Ellis), and the Wharton Head and Neck Centre, Princess Margaret Hospital (Dr Irish), Toronto, Ontario.


RELATED ARTICLE

Informed Consent in Facial Plastic Surgery
Arlen D. Meyers
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6(1):62.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Informed consent - a contemporary myth?
Lemaire
J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88-B:2-7.
FULL TEXT  

Informed Consent in Facial Plastic Surgery
Meyers
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:62-62.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.