You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 5 No. 3, May-Jun 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Transplantation, Other
 •Reconstructive Facial Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Dorsal Onlay Cartilage Autografts

Comparing Resorption in a Rabbit Model

Bruce V. Lattyak, MD; Corey S. Maas, MD; Jonathan M. Sykes, MD

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5:240-243.

Objective  To compare the resorption characteristics of dorsal onlay cartilage autografts from the septum, auricle, and rib.

Methods  Fourteen New Zealand white rabbits underwent harvesting of equal-sized septal, auricular, and costal cartilage grafts free of perichondrium. All autografts were implanted subcutaneously on the nasal dorsum and then removed after 3 months. Graft mass, chondrocyte density, and histologic features from hematoxylin-eosin–stained sections were compared before and 3 months after implantation.

Results  At 3 months after implantation, septal cartilage grafts averaged 30.8% resorption by weight, followed by auricular (23.1%) and costal (7.6%) cartilage. All 3 groups demonstrated similar changes in chondrocyte density and minor calcification at 3 months. There was no evidence of necrosis or inflammatory changes in any of the specimens.

Conclusions  Although the septum is often the preferred source of autogenous cartilage for nasal reconstruction, short-term resorption of septal cartilage appears to be higher for dorsal onlay grafts. The low resorption of costal cartilage may be due in part to its compact shape compared with septal and auricular cartilage. It remains to be seen whether these differences in resorption persist in the long term.


From the Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco (Drs Lattyak and Maas); and Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento (Dr Sykes). Dr Lattyak is currently in private practice in Paget, Bermuda.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Study of Rabbit Septal Cartilage Grafts Placed on the Nasal Dorsum
Ale de Souza et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008;10:250-254.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Analysis of the Physical Properties of Costal Cartilage in a Porcine Model
Lopez et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007;9:35-39.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Transplanted tissue-engineered cartilage.
Christophel et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006;8:117-122.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Viability of Cultured Human Nasal Septum Chondrocytes After Crushing
Cakmak et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7:406-409.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.