You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 5 No. 1, Jan-Feb 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Evaluation of Pericranial Skull Adherence During Healing in the Rabbit Model

J. David Kriet, MD; Caroline Y. Yang, MD; Tom D. Wang, MD; Ted A. Cook, MD

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5:67-69.

Background  The endoscopic brow-lift is a popular technique for rejuvenation of the aging brow and forehead. Long-lasting results depend on readherence of the pericranium to the underlying skull in the newly elevated position. Determination of the time required for pericranial readherence to occur is important when considering optimal brow fixation time postoperatively; however, few studies of pericranial healing exist in the literature.

Objective  To quantify the time required for pericranial adherence after pericranial elevation in a rabbit model.

Design  Anesthetized New Zealand white rabbits underwent elevation of a pericranial flap on day 0. The flap was then repositioned and the skin sutured. One unoperated-on group served as a control. A tensiometer was used to measure the force required to separate the pericranial flap from the skull of the control animals and of test animals killed on postoperative days 3, 5, 8, 10, 13, 17, 20, 25, and 28. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the effect of healing time on the strength of pericranial readherence.

Results  There was a statistically significant decrease in the force required for pericranial separation at 3 and 5 days after surgery compared with the control group. By 8 days postoperatively and throughout the subsequent times examined, no statistically significant differences from the control group were observed.

Conclusion  In this rabbit model, pericranial adherence (as measured by tensile strength) is decreased postoperatively and does not return to baseline levels until postoperative day 8.


From the Departments of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (Dr Kriet), and Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland (Drs Yang, Wang, and Cook).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Eyebrow Position Recognition and Correction in Reconstructive and Cosmetic Surgery
Noel and Frodel
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008;10:44-49.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Endoscopic Forehead-Lift Using a Bioabsorbable Fixation Device
Holzapfel and Mangat
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:389-393.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of Pericranial Skull Adherence and Periosteal Healing in the Rabbit Model
Isse and Sayah
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003;5:164-165.
FULL TEXT  

Periosteal Healing
Sclafani et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003;5:202-202.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.