You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 3 No. 3, Jul-Sep 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Anthropometric Facial Analysis of the African American Woman

Jennifer Parker Porter, MD; Krista L. Olson, MD

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;3:191-197.

Objective  To assess the differences in facial proportions between African American and Caucasian women. Differences within the African American population are sought.

Design  Anthropometric survey.

Participants  Volunteer sample of African American women (N = 108), aged 18 through 30 years, with African American parents and no previous facial surgery or trauma.

Intervention  Photographs and 16 standard anthropometric measurements were taken in concordance with the 9 neoclassical canons. Results were compared with the North American white standard and the neoclassical canons, and an intragroup evaluation was performed. One-way analysis of variance, 99.7% confidence intervals, and t tests were used to test differences for significance.

Main Outcome Measures  Anthropometric measures.

Results  Compared with white women, the following measurements were found to be significantly different (P<.003) in African American women: special head height was shorter; forehead height II was longer; nose length was shorter; lower face height was longer; height of the calva was shorter; forehead height I was longer; and ear length was shorter. In addition, most horizontal measures were wider, ie, eye-fissure width, nasal width, mouth width, and facial width. The nose and ear have greater angles of inclination. Of the 9 neoclassical canons, the orbital proportion was found to include the most proportional subjects (30.6%), followed by the nasoaural proportion (13.0%) and the nasofacial proportion (9.3%). Subcategorization based on nasal dorsal height yielded the most significantly different measures.

Conclusions  African American female facial anthropometric measures, especially those of the horizontal dimension, differ significantly from those of young white subjects. The average African American woman does not fit the neoclassical standard of facial proportion.


From the Bobby R. Alford Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Objective Assessment of Facial Asymmetry in Rhinoplasty Patients
Chatrath et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007;9:184-187.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Korean American Woman's Nose: An In-depth Nasal Photogrammatic Analysis.
Choe et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006;8:319-323.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Korean American Woman's Face: Anthropometric Measurements and Quantitative Analysis of Facial Aesthetics
Choe et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:244-252.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Average African American Male Face: An Anthropometric Analysis
Porter
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:78-81.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.