You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 3 No. 3, Jul-Sep 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures
 •Nasal Surgery
 •Reconstructive Facial Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Quantitative Study of Nasal Tip Support and the Effect of Reconstructive Rhinoplasty

Holger G. Gassner, MD; William J. Remington, MD; David A. Sherris, MD

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;3:178-184.

Objectives  To develop a method to quantify nasal tissue resilience, to establish the normal range for persons without nasal obstruction, and to measure the changes in tissue resilience resulting from standard open rhinoplastic techniques.

Methods  A new device is described that determines nasal tissue resilience. Measurements on the nasal tip were obtained in triplicate at 5 distinct anatomical sites. Normal values (N = 60) were stratified for both sexes into 3 different age groups. Preoperative and postoperative measurements were also obtained in 6 patients who underwent open rhinoplasty for airway obstruction. One patient who underwent intranasal valve repair was included for comparison. All operative patients underwent preoperative and postoperative rhinomanometric measurements.

Results  Across all age and sex groups the anterior septal angle is the firmest area of the nasal tip. The mean tissue resilience over the interdomal area and the midcolumella is significantly greater in men than in women. The resilience of the interdomal area exhibits an age effect, with decreasing stiffness over time. The postoperative changes seen correlate well with the placement of structural grafts during rhinoplasty.

Conclusions  Nasal tip support can be quantified. Normative values have been established, which allow one to identify areas of inadequate tip support in persons with nasal obstruction. Alterations in tip support resulting from surgical intervention can be quantified. Open rhinoplasty techniques are an excellent tool to restore deficiencies in nasal tip support.


From the Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Drs Gassner and Sherris). Dr Remington is in private practice in Minneapolis, Minn. The authors have no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Tripod Theory of Nasal Tip Support Revisited: The Cantilevered Spring Model
Westreich and Lawson
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008;10:170-179.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Defining Nasal Cartilage Elasticity: Biomechanical Testing of the Tripod Theory Based on a Cantilevered Model
Westreich et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007;9:264-270.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relative Benefits of the Versatile Autogenous Costal Cartilage Graft in Septorhinoplasty
Sherris
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2002;4:177-179.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.