You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 3 No. 1, Jan-Mar 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures
 •Nasal Surgery
 •Reconstructive Facial Surgery
 •Rhinoplasty
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Reliability of the Melolabial Flap for Alar Reconstruction

William H. Lindsey, MD

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;3:33-37.

Objective  To review a series of alar reconstruction cases in which the melolabial flap was used.

Design  Case series.

Setting  University medical center and private practice.

Patients  One hundred five consecutive patients with alar defects, resulting from oncologic resection, in whom melolabial flap reconstruction was suitable.

Intervention  Single-stage melolabial flap reconstruction by a single surgeon (W.H.L.).

Main Outcome Measure  Viability of the flap and presence or absence of surgical complications.

Results  There were no complete flap failures. Seven patients had partial necrosis of the distal end of the flap, and 3 of these instances occurred when the flap was rolled back onto itself to reconstruct the nasal vestibule; however, none of the patients required a subsequent operation or notching. Three patients developed hematoma, and 2 of them required a return to the operating room for control of bleeding. Four patients developed superficial infection, and 1 developed cellulitis of the cheek requiring opening of the wound and later revision of the flap. This was the only flap requiring revision. Fifteen patients required 3 or fewer corticosteroid infiltrations postoperatively for flap pin-cushioning or scar hypertrophy.

Conclusion  The melolabial flap is a reliable tool in the reconstructive armamentarium of the facial plastic surgeon.


From the Department of Otolaryngology Head-Neck Surgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, McLean. Dr Lindsey is now affiliated with The Northern Virginia Center for Facial Plastic Surgery, Reston.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Prospective Evaluation of the Incidence of Complications Associated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery
Cook and Perone
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:143-152.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.