You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 2 No. 2, Apr-Jun 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal

Cost Considerations of Converting to Digital Photography

Christopher S. Hollenbeak, MA; Mimi Kokoska, MD; Brendan C. Stack Jr, MD

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2:122-123.

Objectives  To provide the practicing surgeon with data to make an informed economic decision regarding conversion from analog to digital photography.

Methods  A cost analysis of photography based on 35-mm vs digital platforms (low-, medium-, and high-cost hardware).

Results  Break-even thresholds for the investment in a digital platform of low, medium, and high costs were 3674, 15,789, and 34,000 images, respectively.

Conclusion  Given the current excellent image quality and ongoing refinements in digital photography, a digital photography platform may be cost-effective for a busy facial plastic surgery practice.


From the Department of Health Administration, Washington University School of Medicine (Mr Hollenbeak), and Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, St Louis University School of Medicine (Dr Kokoska), St Louis, Mo; and Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey (Dr Stack).


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2(2):155-156.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Objective Assessment of Tip Projection and the Nasolabial Angle in Rhinoplasty
Sporri et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:295-298.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.