You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 11 No. 2, Mar-Apr 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Patient Education/ Health Literacy
 •Patient-Physician Relationship, Other
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Plastic Surgery
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures
 •Hair Replacement Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Correction of the High Female Hairline

Alexander L. Ramirez, MD; Kevin H. Ende, MD; Sheldon S. Kabaker, MD

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(2):84-90.

Objectives  To review a technique and to make quantitative analyses of the senior author's 20-year experience with his preferred technique to correct the high female hairline.

Methods  A retrospective review of 29 female patients who underwent the hairline-lowering procedure performed by the same surgeon (S.S.K.). We analyzed preoperative and postoperative standardized photographs by taking measurements from the medial and lateral canthi to the anterior hairline. Facial height, from the menton to the hairline, was also measured. We calculated mean values and then used a 2-tailed, paired t test to evaluate for statistical significance. Patients also underwent evaluation for satisfaction, complications, and aesthetic result. We reevaluated the measurements from the profile view and compared them with the original data.

Results  The photographed midfrontal hairline position was vertically lowered on average 1.3 cm in patients who underwent a single-stage procedure (P < .001). In retrospect, the analysis was flawed compared with clinical experience. Therefore, the profile views were evaluated, and the correlating true curvilinear advancement was an average of 2.1 cm. Three complications occurred, including 1 major effluvium, 1 minor effluvium, and 1 scar that required revision. Patient satisfaction was extremely high.

Conclusions  Advancement of the female hairline by incorporating an irregular trichophytic incision and a posterior scalp advancement flap is an effective and safe technique that has been used by the senior author for more than 2 decades. The average advancement was 2.1 cm in this study. The technique is immediately effective, well tolerated by patients, and associated with minimal complications. Although it is associated with a potentially visible incision, this technique can be used to make the scar virtually invisible.


Author Affiliations: Aesthetic Facial Plastic Surgery Medical Clinic, Oakland, California (Drs Ende and Kabaker); and Division of Facial Plastic Surgery (Dr Kabaker), Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (Dr Ende), University of California, San Francisco. Dr Ramirez is in private practice in Honolulu, Hawaii.


RELATED ARTICLE

Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(2):76.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.