You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 10 No. 4, Jul-Aug 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Transplantation, Other
 •Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures
 •Facial Plastic Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Autologous Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Graft as Implantable Filler in Nasolabial Fold Correction

Marcus W. Moody, MD; Thomas S. Dozier, MD; Robert F. Garza, MD; Michael K. Bowman, MD; Daniel E. Rousso, MD

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008;10(4):260-266.

Objective  To determine whether superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) graft implantation can improve the appearance of the nasolabial fold.

Methods  Single-blinded cohort study in a private facial plastic surgery practice. Treatment and control patients were selected from those presenting for aesthetic surgery. All patients underwent rhytidectomy with SMAS imbrication by a single surgeon. In addition, treatment patients underwent subcutaneous implantation of excised SMAS strips to the nasolabial fold. Treatment and control patients were matched for any other simultaneous procedures known to affect appearance of the nasolabial folds. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were graded by 3 blinded observers using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale to evaluate the nasolabial fold. Postoperative photographs were evaluated approximately 3 months and again 1 year after the procedure.

Results  Compared with controls, there was a significant difference in the nasolabial folds of patients undergoing SMAS implantation at the 3-month postoperative evaluation (P = .03; {chi}2 = 4.696). This benefit was lost when the results were evaluated 1 year after the procedure (P = .88; {chi}2 = 0.0212).

Conclusion  Superficial musculoaponeurotic system implantation to the nasolabial folds offers modest temporary improvement to this area in patients undergoing rhytidectomy with SMAS imbrication.


Author Affiliations: Rousso Facial Plastic Surgery (Drs Moody and Rousso) and Divisions of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Dr Garza) and Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (Dr Bowman), University of Alabama, Birmingham; and Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Dozier).







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.