You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 1 No. 1, Jan-Mar 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Reconstructive Facial Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Modification of the Subunit Principle for Reconstruction of Nasal Tip and Dorsum Defects

Kevin A. Shumrick, MD; Andrew Campbell, MD; Ferdinand F. Becker, MD; Ira D. Papel, MD

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999;1:9-15.

This article reports our observations on, and modification of, the subunit principle with regard to reconstruction of nasal tip and dorsum defects. Forty-two patients who underwent reconstruction of a nasal tip and/or dorsum defect with a forehead flap were reviewed. These patients were categorized by how the subunit principle was used in their reconstruction and graded on the aesthetic outcome of the reconstruction. We found that the patients who had both the nasal tip and dorsum replaced obtained better results than those who had just 1 subunit replaced (P=.008). Review of postoperative photographs shows that the reason for this discrepancy in aesthetic outcomes is the line of transition between the forehead skin and remaining nasal skin if only 1 subunit is replaced. With this observation in mind, we feel that patients undergoing reconstruction of the nasal tip and/or dorsum should be evaluated for discrepancies in tissue type between the recipient nasal site and forehead donor site. If the tissues are noted to be significantly disparate, the reconstructive surgeon may consider replacing both subunits with a single forehead flap.


From the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Ohio (Drs Shumrick and Campbell); Facial Plastic Surgical Center Inc, Vero Beach, Fla (Dr Becker); and Facial Plastic Surgicenter Ltd, Owing Mills, Md (Dr Papel).


RELATED LETTER

Modification of the Subunit Principle
Kevin A. Shumrick, Andrew Campbell, Ferdinand F. Becker, and Ira D. Papel
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999;1(2):136-137.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Modification of the Subunit Principle
Gary C. Burget
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999;1(1):16-18.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Triple-Flap Technique for Reconstruction of Large Nasal Defects
Wild and Hybarger
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2001;3:17-21.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Modification of the Subunit Principle
Shumrick et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 1999;1:136-137.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.